jepara: the field of contestation
menristek socializing nuclear policy
allegedly consistently against nuclear
if really safe, build in in jakarta
hudi of batan vs lilo of marem
nuclear under scrutiny of sacred verses
a line of references: 2 for cons, 2 for pros
the next day, nuclear is forbidden in muria
a head up for 2009 1 Comment
|
 | drake4life wrote on Sep 26, '07, edited on Sep 26, '07 Man, religious figures trying to weigh in the nuclear debate? Why? It's not like they know any better.
I am an avid supporter of nuclear power. |
 | very interesting.... i'd like to hear more about this... |
 | nyuculear kalo ada george bush |
 | Care to share what are the policies and more info related ? |
 | NIMBY in Jepara! :D You go, people :D |
 | this is remind me of "Angels & Demons", when technology vs religion |
 | wah akhirnya si prof muncul lagi :) |
 | ykme wrote on Sep 27, '07 |
 | Sulit mengatakan satu hal itu mudarat dan satu hal itu manfaat.. jika terlalu cepat menyimpulkan tanpa ada kajian lebih dalam. Seperti kata pepatah lama : PISAU BERMATA DUA.. ini kan sebuah ungkapan harafiah bagi teknologi.
Jangan kategorikan pisau sebagai alat pembunuh, sementara pisau membantu kemudahan hidup manusia dalam banyak hal. |
 | PLTN...Pesantren Listriknya berTenaga Nuklir...haahahahhaa....ga masyalaaaah... |
 | drake4life: they have to say too. like one saying goes, "tech is far too important to leave to engineers"
merlyna and rasti812: still in the process. will publish some writing on this sexy topic.
chaerani : bush is in favor of indo's nuke.
kucingkembar: that's really true. bad news for anti-nuke activists, good news for ristek
motulz: not always the case since tech often uses tech for its purposes.
dwardani: akhirnya mampir juga
robymuhamad: selain ristek dan organ2nya, ada juga politisi lokal dan penduduk sekitar yang segan menyatakan menerima. tapi di pembahasan NU malam itu, sekitar 30 persen ustad2 menerima dengan alasan masing2, termasuk satu yang ikutan rombongan ristek ke korea selatan melihat pltn disana.
ykme: just wait and see.
motulz: pertanyaanya: siapa yang memiliki otoritas untuk menetukan manfaat dan mudarat?
agescool: cool, isnt? hehehehe |
 | Man, ustadz weighing in nuclear teachnology. It's not haram. Is it? It's something God (Allah Swt) has allowed man to harness. Now, we fear because people who don't know any better, who happen to be relgious figures, think they're nuclear physicists. |
 | republic wrote on Sep 27, '07, edited on Sep 27, '07 i dont think they're trying to act like nuclear physicist. they just wanted to place nuclear within a religous context. in fact, their fatwa is made based on references from scientists, both from pro and con camps as shown in one the pictures above. |
 | will this be in your EWC publication? |
 | haram ato nggak tuh masalah manusia ato Tuhan ? saya malah lebih tertarik ama judul foto ini nih... "if really safe, build in in jakarta" |
 | republic wrote on Sep 27, '07, edited on Sep 27, '07 merlyna: sure. will be the opening of my article
kupple: thats a backfire to menristek for claiming nuclear totally safe |
 | kalo argumen gus dur gimana so? biasanya khan dia nyeleneh.. |
 | kata gusdur, pake energi yang lain, termasuk tenaga dalam...heheheh padahl proyek pltn sekarang sebenarnya jalan karena restu gusdur juga waktu jadi presiden. tapi sekarang dia inshaf bisa dibaca disini |
 | selain bayu (angin) energinya relatif kecil, teknologinya akan jauh lebih efisien kalo institusinya terdesentralisasi, tidak kayak model pln sekarang yang kontrolnya terpusat. anyway, bayu, biofuel, biogass, dll masuk sebagai alternatif yang dikembangkan juga walopun proporsinya cuma 2 persen dari total energi nasional. |
 | curi-curi kampanye ya Mas, sempat saya melihat "Selentingan" kampanye di plastik keresek untuk membungkus daging kurban..... |
| |